Grant: $361,216 - National Institutes of Health - Jun. 4, 2009
No votes have been cast for this award yet
Award Description: Important concerns have been raised about the ethics of phase 1 clinical trials in oncology. In previous research, many patients have reported high expectations of personal clinical benefit from phase 1 trials. In the project leading to this application (R01CA100771), the investigators examined what patients mean when they report high expectations of benefit and whether these reports reflect poor understanding about the phase 1 trial. Using a mixed-methods approach, the investigators identified several limitations on the ability to truly understand what high expectations mean to every patient. In continuing their work, the investigators propose to evaluate the ethical significance of high expectations of benefit from a different perspective. Specifically, the investigators propose to address whether high expectations of benefit are harmful to patients in phase 1 trials. Many patients will not experience good clinical outcomes from phase 1 trials. Decision affect theory predicts that patients with higher expectations of benefit might experience greater distress and negative feelings about their participation. There are no data available to determine when high expectations of benefit reflect a helpful coping mechanism rather than a potentially harmful form of denial. This gap in knowledge presents serious difficulty, because there is no evidence to guide clinicians and researchers in deciding whether to foster or discourage patients' expressions of high expectations. With a renewal of R01CA100771, the investigators will collect data that will help clinicians, researchers, and persons charged with human subjects protection to understand the consequences of high expectations of benefit among participants in phase 1 trials. The investigators will achieve this objective by pursuing 3 Specific Aims: (1) To describe associations between expectations of benefit and later physical and mental well-being among participants in phase 1 trials who experience disease progression. The investigators hypothesize that higher expectations are associated with greater increases in depression and anxiety, and they will explore associations with physical functioning. (2) To describe associations between expectations of benefit and later perceptions of the consent process among participants in phase 1 trials who experience disease progression. The investigators hypothesize that higher expectations are associated with more regret concerning the decision to enroll in the trial. (3) To explore relationships between expectations and later experiences among phase 1 research participants who have nonprogressive disease at the time of their first disease reevaluation. The investigators will accomplish these aims in a prospective study using structured interviews of patients immediately after enrollment in a phase 1 trial and follow-up interviews 1 week after the patients receive the results of their initial disease reevaluations. The study will generate the first large-scale data set that addresses an important gap in understanding of research participants' welfare in phase 1 oncology trials. If high confidence in a good outcome has negative consequences for patients with poor clinical outcomes, this finding might suggest that clinicians and researchers should try to reduce patients' high expectations. However, if there are no negative effects of high expectations, clinicians and researchers might consider whether to allow such therapeutic optimism in patients who have demonstrated clear understanding of the trial to which they have consented
Project Description: See Award Description
Jobs Summary: FACULTY SCIENTIFIC/ELEC/RES TECHNOLOGY (Total jobs reported: 0)
Project Status: Less Than 50% Completed
This award's data was last updated on Jun. 4, 2009. Help expand these official descriptions using the wiki below.